Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows
by Shari Green
**contains spoilers**
She did it. Rowling completed the daunting task of wrapping up the plotlines of a seven-book series with skill and style. Is The Deathly Hallows perfect? No. The middle wanders too long through scenes of helplessness and despair, giving me the sense that perhaps Rowling is guilty of padding to stretch through the typical school-year timeline. Aside from that, however, Rowling’s pacing is flawless. The plot, too, is well done: enticing and intriguing, neither too sappy nor too shocking (yes, Dobby’s death shocked and saddened me, but not in the way the loss of one of the three main characters would have).
The prolific symbolism and deep-rooted themes work well, with allusions – either intentional or not – to C.S. Lewis, Tolkien, and the Bible. The one misstep is the horribly blatant proclamation of Harry as saviour and guide. Personally, I prefer subtlety.
I’ve heard criticism of Rowling’s characters being too black-and-white, but The Deathly Hallows, perhaps more than any of the other six books, shows more complex characters, which is quite satisfying. I’m delighted that Neville grew into a leader and that he gets to be a hero; I like that Dudley actually has a character arc; I’m not thrilled with the insights into Snape’s character, but overall his storyline has a fitting resolution; and Harry’s continued wrestling with his own “dark side” is very well done.
Each character’s voice is steady – a testament to Rowling’s skill – with one glaring exception: when Mrs. Weasley screams at Bellatrix, “Not my daughter, you bitch!”, I was jolted from the story, not by the curse per se, but by the leap out of voice. Some readers will disagree, notably Stephen King, who says the use of the b-word in this situation is “perfect”. (Who am I to disagree with both Rowling and King?)
My biggest complaint is the “nineteen years later” epilogue. I found it to be a tremendous letdown, so much so that I immediately re-read the second-to-last chapter to end the book where it should’ve ended. A writer friend of mine disagrees: she loves the epilogue. While I suppose Rowling wanted to provide closure and prevent questions such as “is Voldemort really dead?”, my cynical self feels the final chapter is the author’s way of opening (widely) the possibility of next-generation Hogwarts stories.
Despite my criticisms, I love the book. It’s good. Great, even. Well worth suffering through the months of over-done hype. I enjoyed it, my kids enjoyed it, and we’ll all read it again some day. Which reminds me: a pox on the nay-sayers who think Pottermania is doing nothing toward creating lifelong readers out of today’s HP fans. Kids are reading; adults are reading; it’s a good thing!

Recent Comments